The mattress guide

A guide to selecting the appropriate support surface

 

 

Using an appropriate support surface is crucial, but it is only one aspect of preventing pressure ulcers/injuries. Effective prevention requires addressing and assessing multiple factors, including skin integrity, tissue perfusion, mobility, nutrition, and overall health.¹¹ In addition, patients have unique needs based on their medical conditions and personal circumstances.

Pressure ulcers/injuries are localized injuries to the skin and/or underlying tissue,⁵ typically caused by poor blood circulation due to pressure or a combination of pressure and shear.⁵ ⁶ Conditions such as immobility, reduced sensitivity to pain, previous tissue damage, and malnutrition can further increase the risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries.⁵ ¹¹

When selecting a support surface, it is important to adopt a holistic approach that considers all these factors. This ensures a comprehensive care plan, enabling caregivers to tailor both the support surface and other interventions to the specific needs of each patient.⁵ ¹¹

Research has identified seven key steps in preventing pressure ulcers/injuries, collectively defined as the aSSKINg skin care bundle framework.¹ ² ³ By integrating these steps into a holistic care plan, caregivers can significantly reduce the risk of pressure ulcers/injuries and improve patient outcomes.

Surface selection and use

As stated by international guidelines⁵ and the aSSKINg¹ ² ³ care bundle framework, selecting a support surface that minimizes pressure, shear, and friction is one of the key elements in pressure ulcer/injury prevention.⁶ To ensure that the support surface is adapted to the patient’s individual needs, three types of assessments should be considered:

Risk assessment
Skin assessment
Assessment of mobility level

Risk Assessment

Selecting a support surface is closely connected to the risk assessment, as the risk level helps guide the selection of an appropriate support surface. By performing risk assessments, patients at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries can be identified early.⁴

Several commonly used tools help evaluate the risk of pressure ulcer/injury development.⁴ These include the Braden, Waterlow, Norton, RAPS, Purpose-T, and PUSH tools. These tools assess various factors that contribute to pressure ulcers/injuries, such as mobility, skin integrity, sensory perception, and nutritional status. Based on the assessment, patients are categorized into different risk levels (e.g., low, moderate, high, very high).

While performing a risk assessment gives a valuable indication of which support surface to select, relying solely on the assessment tool provides limited guidance.⁵ The risk assessment must be part of a holistic evaluation that also includes a full skin assessment and an assessment of mobility level.¹¹

Skin assessment

Performing regular skin assessments is critical for preventing pressure ulcers/injuries and for selecting an appropriate support surface. These assessments allow healthcare providers to identify early signs of pressure ulcers/injuries, such as redness, discoloration, or skin breakdown. Early detection enables prompt intervention, potentially preventing the development of more severe pressure ulcers/injuries.⁵ ⁷

The patient’s skin should be examined systematically from head to toe. While pressure ulcers/injuries most commonly occur over bony prominences, they can also develop under medical devices such as masks or tubing. The most vulnerable areas should be checked at least once a day.⁷

Best practice guidelines emphasize that skin assessments must be performed with an awareness of skin tone. Research shows that many signs clinicians are trained to look for, such as redness or blanching, may present differently depending on the patient’s skin tone. For example, dark skin rarely shows the blanching response that is often used to identify early-stage pressure injuries.⁸ It is therefore essential to adapt skin assessments to account for differences in skin tone as part of a full holistic evaluation.

Additionally, it is important to be aware that patients who have had previous pressure ulcers/injuries are more prone to developing new ones. Former pressure ulcers/injuries can leave the skin and underlying tissues weakened or scarred, making these areas more susceptible to future damage.⁹

Summary
Skin assessments help determine the patient’s overall risk for developing pressure ulcers/injuries,⁷ which directly influences the choice of a support surface. Ongoing skin assessments also allow caregivers to evaluate the effectiveness of the chosen support surface and other preventive interventions. If skin integrity worsens, it may indicate the need for a different support surface or additional preventive measures.

Assessment of mobility level

While risk and skin assessments are essential when selecting a support surface, mobility assessment remains the most critical, as immobility is a leading cause of pressure ulcers/injuries.⁵ ¹¹

When a patient becomes immobile or loses sensation⁵ due to disease, spinal cord injury, sedation, or paralysis, the body’s natural protective mechanism of spontaneous movement is impaired. This absence of movement exposes patients to a significant risk of pressure ulcers/injuries. Without regular movement, areas of the body in contact with a support surface endure prolonged periods of unrelieved pressure, with or without shear. Sustained pressure restricts blood flow to the tissues, depriving them of oxygen and nutrients, which can cause tissue damage and necrosis, leading to pressure injuries.⁵

Immobile patients, especially those with conditions affecting sensory perception (e.g., spinal cord injuries), may not feel discomfort or pain that would normally prompt them to change positions. This lack of sensory feedback further contributes to prolonged pressure and the development of pressure ulcers/injuries.⁵

In an older population, common chronic diseases can lead to immobility and, in turn, to poor blood circulation. Inadequate blood flow means tissues do not receive enough oxygen and nutrients, making them even more susceptible to damage from prolonged pressure.¹²

Risklevels

Immobile patients are more susceptible to shear. Shear occurs when layers of skin move in opposite directions, often caused by sliding down in bed or being repositioned. Shear in combination with pressure can damage the skin and underlying tissues, increasing the risk of pressure ulcers/injuries.6

Mobile individuals can frequently shift their weight and change positions, which helps alleviate pressure on vulnerable areas. In contrast, immobile patients often rely on caregivers for repositioning. Without regular and adequate repositioning, these patients may remain in the same position for extended periods, exacerbating pressure on certain areas and increasing the risk of pressure ulcers/injuries.

Immobile patients are also often at risk of incontinence or excessive sweating, which can lead to moist skin. Moisture weakens the skin’s barrier function, making it more vulnerable to breakdown from pressure, shear, and friction.11 It also creates an environment conducive to bacterial growth, increasing the risk of infection.5

Prolonged immobility can lead to muscle atrophy and loss of subcutaneous tissue, reducing the natural cushioning that protects bony prominences from pressure. Thinner, less resilient tissues are more prone to damage and ulceration.10

Summary:
Immobility plays a key role in the development of pressure ulcers/injuries as it causes:

Prolonged pressure
Increased shear and friction
The need for frequent repositioning
Reduced sensory perception
Impaired blood flow
Moisture-related skin problems
Muscle atrophy

Together, these issues lead to the breakdown of skin and underlying tissues, resulting in pressure ulcers/injuries.

Patient in hospital bed

Continuously evaluate the patient’s mobility level and chose a support surface that encourages independent movement

For patients who have experienced prolonged immobility, such as after surgery or due to critical illness, maintaining and restoring mobility is essential for recovery and overall well-being. Encouraging movement, even in small steps, can play a transformative role in improving patient outcomes.

To effectively promote mobility, it is essential to continuously assess the patient’s mobility level and choose a support surface that encourages independent movement. Foam surfaces often provide superior support and are more effective at promoting movement compared to air mattresses.

By selecting the right support surface tailored to the patient’s needs, healthcare providers can create an environment that not only helps prevent and treat pressure injuries but also supports patients in regaining or maintaining their mobility and independence.

Understanding the different types of support surfaces

Care of Sweden’s support surfaces can be categorized into these categories: preventative foam, hybrid mattresses, constant low pressure (CLP) mattresses, and dynamic mattresses.

Preventative foam mattresses

Preventative foam mattresses work by redistributing pressure to minimize the risk of pressure ulcer/injury development. Foam mattresses are designed to distribute the patient’s weight over a large surface area, which helps reduce pressure on any single point, particularly over bony prominences such as the heels, sacrum, and hips. The foam conforms to the contours of the body, ensuring that pressure is evenly distributed.

Preventative mattress

Hybrid mattresses

There are many variations of hybrid mattresses. Typically, hybrid mattresses work by combining foam and air cells to provide enhanced pressure redistribution, support, and comfort. Both powered and non-powered hybrid mattresses are available (e.g., AreaZone, Cirrus).

The foam layers in a hybrid mattress conform to the body’s shape, distributing weight evenly across the surface. This helps to minimize pressure points, particularly over bony prominences. The air cells can be adjusted using different techniques to change the firmness and support. This adjustability allows for customized pressure relief and support tailored to the patient’s needs.

Some hybrid mattresses, like Cirrus, have a dynamic function where the air cells periodically inflate and deflate. This dynamic action creates pressure relief, reducing the risk of prolonged pressure on any single area.

Constant Low Pressure (CLP) mattresses

In Constant Low Pressure (CLP) mattresses, the pressure in the air cells is evenly distributed over the entire support surface. CLP mattresses work by redistributing pressure across the body to minimize peak pressure points that can lead to pressure ulcers/injuries.

A powered CLP mattress adjusts the pressure within the cells according to the patient’s weight and therefore offers several benefits over a foam mattress, particularly in terms of pressure redistribution, comfort, and overall effectiveness in preventing pressure ulcers/injuries.

Thus, powered CLP mattresses allow for customization of pressure settings based on individual patient needs, offering a level of personalized care that foam mattresses cannot provide.

Constant low pressure mattress

Dynamic mattress system

Dynamic mattresses

A dynamic mattress creates pressure relief and improves tissue perfusion (the flow of blood throughout the body carrying nutrients, oxygen, and removing waste from cells) through alternating movements. As the air cells inflate and deflate, pressure is alternately applied and released from different areas of the body in contact with the mattress.

The cyclical pressure relief stimulates blood circulation and prevents tissue ischemia (lack of oxygen), which is crucial for maintaining tissue perfusion.

Dynamic mattresses offer the highest level of pressure relief and are ideal for patients at high or very high risk of pressure ulcers/injuries or those with existing severe pressure ulcers/injuries.

Read more about our products

Selecting among Care of Sweden’s mattresses

How can this risk assessment guide me?
When selecting a support surface, it is cmucial to have a holistic approach and consider both the results from the risk assessment as well as the skin assessment. However, the level of mobility must also be taken into consideration, as immobility leads to prolonged pressure, increased shear and friction forces, reduced blood flow, and, in the end, pressure ulcers/injuries.

Risk assessment can be used as a tool to guide the selection of a support surface according to the table below.

immobile

The limited

Level of mobility

When assessing the level of mobility, key things to look for are:
How much can the patient move independently?
Can the patient change positions in bed or a chair without assistance?
Does the patient require help to reposition or shift weight?
Is the patient confined to bed, or can they sit up in a chair or ambulate for short distances?
How often is the patient able to get out of bed or change positions?
The personas below visualize how the level of mobility can be used as a guide to select the correct support surface.

PERSONAS

When finding the right persona and mattress for your patient, please take all risk and mobility factors in consideration, only you have the full pciture of your patients unique situation and needs.

Disclaimers

To achieve a fully holistic approach when selecting a support surface, it is essential to consider other risk factors that may not be included in the risk or skin assessment. These can include factors related to medical conditions, nutritional status, sensation, tissue perfusion, and more.

Examples:
For a patient who is completely immobile and has already developed pressure ulcers/injuries, a dynamic support surface with a pulsating mode is likely the most appropriate choice for optimal prevention and treatment.

A patient assessed to be at high risk for pressure ulcers/injuries, who can walk short distances with or without assistance and reposition themselves in bed, would likely benefit most from a constant low-pressure mattress.

For a patient with intact skin or early-stage pressure ulcers/injuries, who can walk independently with or without a rollator and reposition themselves in bed, a highly specified foam mattress, such as a 5Zon, is likely suitable.

Selecting a Support Surface from a Health Economic Perspective
Choosing the correct support surface is important not only from a clinical perspective but also from a health economics standpoint. Using advanced and costly systems when less sophisticated, more affordable alternatives could be sufficient can lead to increased expenses for both the healthcare system and society.

Providing patients with an appropriate support surface based on their mobility and specific risk level is essential for optimizing clinical outcomes, health economics, and delivering cost-effective care.

The aSSKINg method for preventing pressure ulcers/injuries was developed by NHS Improvement in the United Kingdom. This method is part of their broader efforts to enhance patient care and prevent harm in clinical settings. The aSSKINg framework is based on a comprehensive review of existing evidence and best practices for the prevention and management of pressure ulcers/injuries. The development of the method involved synthesizing findings from multiple research studies, clinical guidelines, and expert consensus. Key components of the research and evidence base include:

Disclaimer 1: The content in “Selecting a Support Surface Based on Risk Assessment” is intended as supplementary support and does not replace the care organization’s local or national guidelines. The classification of mattress suitability is based on general product characteristics and not tailored to individual patient needs. The responsibility for prescribing the appropriate support surface lies solely with the patient’s responsible clinical professional, who must ensure that the chosen solution aligns with the patient’s unique and individual clinical needs.

Disclaimer 2: The content of this document is subject to change without notice. To ensure the correct use of each product, the product’s Instructions for Use (IFU) must always be read prior to use.

 

References

1. Lorraine Wright, Heather Macgowan, Pressure ulcer risk assessment & prevention guideline, NHS Forth Valley, Tissue Vialbility Team, 01.05.2020

2. Whitlock J. SSKIN bundle: preventing pressure damage across the health-care community.

British Journal of Community Nursing. 2014; 18:suppl 9: s32-39.

3. McCoulough S. Adapting a SSKIN bundle for carers to aid identification of pressure damage and ulcer risks in the community. British Journal of Community Nursing. 2016 June; Suppl:S19 – S25.

4. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2014) Pressure ulcers: prevention and management of pressure ulcers. NICE clinical guideline 179. NICE, London Overview | Pressure ulcers: prevention and management | Guidance | NICE

5. European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance. Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries: Clinical Practice Guideline. The international Guideline. Emily Haesler (Ed.). EPUAP/NPIAP/PPPIA: 2019

6. Portoghese C et al. 2024. The Role of Shear Stress and Shear Strain in Pressure Injury Development.

7. Fletcher J. Pressure ulcer education 3: skin assessment and care, Nursing Times, December 2019, 115:12, 26-29

8. Pramod S. Mayes J. Bowling K. McDermott G., Implementation of skin tone assessment in pressure ulcer prevention, Wounds International 2024:15,1

9. Pressure Ulcers: Prevention and Management” Authors: National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) Publication Year: 2019 Source: NPIAP Clinical Practice Guideline. Guidelines – National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (npiap.com)

10. Parry Selina. M and Puthucheary Zudin A., The impact of extended bed rest on the musculoskeletal system in the critical care environment, Extreme Physiology & Medicine, 2015

11. Coleman S., Nixon J., Keen J., Wilson L., McGinnis E., Dealey C., Stubbs N., Farrin A., Dowding D., Scols J.M.G.A., Cuddigan J., Berlowitz D., Jude E., Vowden P., Schoonhoven L., Bader D.L., Gefen A., Oomens C.W.J. & Nelson E.A. (2014) A new pressure ulcer conceptual framework. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2014

12. Jaul E., Barron J.,  Rosenzweig J. P., Menczel J.,  An overview of co-morbidities and the development of pressure ulcers among older adults, BMC Geriatr. 2018